The Supreme Court of Pakistan held that khula is a right that must be explicitly sought by a woman, and a court cannot grant khula without her clear request and consent.
Supreme Court Judgment on Khula
n 15 February 2024, a three-member bench of the Supreme Court of Pakistan decided the case of Ibrahim Khan versus Mst. Saima Khan and others. The bench comprised Justice Yahya Afridi, Justice Amin-ud-Din Khan and Justice Ayesha A. Malik.
The case arose from proceedings before the Peshawar High Court concerning dissolution of marriage, maintenance and dower. The Supreme Court examined whether a court could grant khula when the woman had sought dissolution of marriage on the ground of cruelty rather than specifically requesting khula.
- The judgment was decided on 15 February 2024.
- The case was Ibrahim Khan v. Mst. Saima Khan and others.
- The case is reported as PLD 2024 Supreme Court 645.
- A three-member Supreme Court bench heard the matter.
- The case concerned khula, dissolution of marriage and dower rights
Khula Must Be Explicitly Sought by the Woman
The Supreme Court explained that khula is a distinct legal form of dissolution of marriage and that the right to seek khula belongs to the woman. The Court held that she must express her intention to seek khula clearly and unequivocally.
The Court further held that a court cannot independently convert a claim for dissolution of marriage on the ground of cruelty into a claim for khula when the woman has not requested khula. This distinction is important because khula may involve waiver of the woman's dower rights.
- Khula is a distinct form of dissolution of marriage.
- A woman must clearly express her intention to seek khula.
- A court cannot grant khula on its own when it has not been requested.
- The woman's consent is important before khula can be granted.
- Khula may have consequences for dower rights.
Distinction Between Khula and Dissolution on Grounds of Cruelty
The Supreme Court distinguished between khula and dissolution of marriage under the Dissolution of Muslim Marriages Act, 1939. The Court explained that these are separate legal routes with different requirements and consequences.
In the case, the respondent had sought dissolution of marriage on the ground of cruelty and had not requested khula. The Court held that the lower courts had erred by granting khula without her explicit request. The judgment also addressed her entitlement to dower in light of the circumstances of the case.
- Khula and dissolution under the Dissolution of Muslim Marriages Act are legally distinct.
- Dissolution on statutory grounds can have different consequences for dower.
- A court must consider the actual relief requested by the woman.
- Khula cannot be granted without her clear request.
- The judgment clarified the relationship between khula, consent and dower rights.
This article is general information about how things work in Pakistan, not legal advice. Procedure varies by province, forum and the facts of your matter.
Need this handled properly?
Find a verified lawyer who works on matters like this every week.
Find attorneys